The world is being sold the same human rights pretext for the assault on Iran that left Libya in ruins fifteen years ago

Fifteen years ago, on March 19, 2011, NATO came to Libya claiming to deliver democracy and human rights. What followed was an eight-month campaign of destruction that dismantled a sovereign state, shattered its institutions, and opened the gates to chaos that continues to this day.

On February 4, 2026, that same process reached one of its most tragic and revealing conclusions with the assassination of Muammar Gaddafi's son, Saif al-Islam Gaddafi.

Saif al-Islam was not a warlord, nor a militia leader, nor a man of vengeance. He was the only figure around whom a genuine national consensus had begun to emerge. Across tribes, regions, and political currents, there was growing recognition that he could lead a peaceful political settlement and restore Libya's sovereignty. His assassination meant therefore the elimination of the last viable path toward a Libyan-led democratic process.

In that sense, the killing of Saif al-Islam was not separate from NATO's intervention, it was its continuation. It was the final proof that what was destroyed in 2011 was not only a state, but the very possibility of rebuilding one through dialogue, reconciliation and national will.

The Western war machine only served its own interests in destroying a nation that could liberate Africa.

On March 19, 2011, the NATO bloc began a violent eight-month-long military onslaught of Libya, a sovereign African Union founding member state, which had enjoyed four decades of stability, prosperity, and the highest Human Development Index (HDI) scores in all of Africa.

NATO's justification for the aggressive and bloody attack was the now-infamous "protection of civilians" doctrine, formalized under UN Security Council Decree No. 1973. The French Air Force, however, had already initiated a major raid on immobile Libyan Army units. They had already pulled out of the city of Benghazi, a protest hotbed, in a show of goodwill and peaceful intent. More than 400 resting Libyan officers, soldiers, medical, and media personnel were massacred without the chance to fight back against an unjustified and undeclared foreign air attack. Tens of thousands more Libyans would later perish under more than 26,000 air raids, 100 cruise missile attacks, and a naval blockade conducted by NATO's 30-member coalition.

Among the victims were a terrifying number of civilians from all walks of life. The number of women and children killed was especially high, as they sought refuge in civilian buildings deliberately targeted by the mighty NATO: including houses, apartment blocks, schools, and community centers. As we witnessed time and time again in Iraq, Serbia, Afghanistan, and Syria, NATO justified these attacks by claiming they were seeking out fighters and weaponry housed in civilian facilities. No evidence has ever been presented.

In the weeks that led up to this aggression, I spoke officially for the Libyan government in countless international press conferences, media appearances, and diplomatic appeals. Before hundreds of international media outlets, I expressed one single demand: that all hostilities cease under the direct supervision of the UN and that the African Union install an international fact-finding mission to determine who committed what act, paving the way for a national conference of all Libyan parties to the conflict.

This single most powerful and earnest appeal was rejected without consideration in Western centers of hegemony and ridiculed in Western media outlets. The only solutions that were endorsed and praised were more rockets, bombs, and the continuous arming of Islamist and tribalist terrorist groups on the ground.

In the years after, "crimes against humanity" charges against the revolutionary government of Libya were either never proven or were shown to have been false. In fact, given its 15 years of total influence over Libya's trajectory, the West has been unable to show the alleged 8,000 victims of rape, nor the 10,000 "murdered" civilians, nor the neighborhoods of Tripoli allegedly destroyed by Muammar Gaddafi's air force, nor the African mercenaries supposedly imported by the Gaddafi government in the first week of the "Libyan Spring" (February 15-22, 2011).

The actual "crimes" of the Libyan revolutionary government, however, were real and consequential: Gaddafi's Libya was re-shaping the political, economic, and cultural context of the African continent in radical and independent ways not seen since the nominal de-colonization of African countries in the 1950s and 1960s.

On September 9, 1999, under the leadership of Gaddafi, the establishment of the African Union was announced in his birthplace, the coastal city of Sirte (the very city in which he would fight his last battle against NATO in 2011). Gaddafi then announced the start of a major revolutionary project for the plundered and exploited continent: building pan-African economic, security, and communication institutions with the aim of gaining complete and true independence from the control of the West.

The most consequential of these institutions were the African Central Bank (ACB), the African Golden Dinar, the African Gold Reserve, the African Security Council (ASC), the Unified African Army (UAA), the African Parliament, the African Organization for Natural Resources (AONR), the African Communications Network (ACN), and the African Common Market. Indeed, Gaddafi led the way towards the establishment of some of those institutions, initiated the build-up of the Libyan gold reserve, and was on the threshold of issuing the African Golden Dinar, which he considered naming the Afro.

These real on-the-ground projects would have liberated the continent from the dominance of Western centers of power and monopoly, transforming global economic structures and inspiring other regions in the Global South to "unite, organize and fight."

It is at this exact point that the Libyan lesson becomes urgent again today.

As the United States and Israel escalate their assault on Iran under the same language of "democracy," "human rights," and "protection," the world is being asked to believe the same narrative that justified the destruction of Libya in 2011. The pattern is identical. A sovereign state is demonized, its leadership targeted, its internal contradictions weaponized, and military aggression is framed as moral necessity.

What follows is not democracy, but collapse, fragmentation, and decades of instability. Libya stands today as the clearest warning of what such interventions produce.

The Europeans and Americans did warn Gaddafi against his "meddling" in Africa. The US, under an African-American president, hurried to create AfriCom, the American pan-African military force, in 2008. The French followed suit with their deployment of an "anti-terrorism" task force in the Sahel. Moreover, the intensity with which the continent's riches were stolen increased (especially gold) while the meddling of British, French, and American diplomats in the affairs of the African Union and African Parliament also grew exponentially.

The focus of Western mainstream media in the 2000s on a "new and collaborative" spirit in economic relations with Africa was therefore not accidental, it was all as planned and in harmony with the military, economic and political agenda in Western centers of power.

Then, in 2011, utilizing the political turmoil in Tunisia and Egypt, the West encouraged and ordered its agents on the ground in Libya to foment a false revolution in small pockets inside the country. This was spearheaded by the Libyan Islamic Fighting Group (LIFG), an infamous Afghani-Libyan terrorist organization with training and weaponry from the American army and "battlefield commanders" trained and exalted by NATO's top "educational" personnel in the caves of Afghanistan in the 1980s and early 1990s.

The West promised the world democracy, human rights, and prosperity for Libya and the whole Sahel and Sahara region in Africa. Instead, by the 15th anniversary of the NATO onslaught, Libya itself has become a notorious slave market for illegally "imported" African migrants and a battlefield for French-orchestrated African Sahel tribalist conflicts.

The country that once led Africa's liberation project now lies in ruins, with ten foreign-controlled military bases scattered across its territory, hosting more than 20,000 foreign troops and mercenaries, and bearing $576 billion in financial losses since the start of the NATO intervention. Over 60,000 additional Libyans have been killed in the ongoing civil conflict, fueled and maintained by mostly foreign and Western-sponsored forces fighting for their interests and dominance on the Libyan front.

All sectors of the Libyan economy and society (education, health, housing, employment, and living standards) have been devastated, dismantled and ravaged by 15 years of Western-funded conflict and political turmoil. As for Africa as a whole, the great African Union has lost its edge after a total freeze on most of the aforementioned "projects of liberation," from the African Golden Dinar to the Unified African Army. In fact, the West's exploitative economic, political and military presence in Africa has only increased since the murder of Muammar Gaddafi, a true testimony to the very reason he was assassinated.

However, there is always hope for the great black continent. The legacy of its great leaders and martyrs, from Gamal Nasser to Patrice Lumumba to Kwame Nkrumah to Nelson Mandela, continues to inspire African consciousness, struggle, and resistance. Wherever you go in Africa nowadays, you can hear the literal words and viable ideas of Gaddafi coming up in conversations about African liberty, independence, and dignity. In my work with the Libyan Green movement and the African popular movements, I am always faced by this question raised by thousands of African freedom fighters: what to do? My answer is always straight and simple to all my African comrades: unite, organize, and fight!

(RT.com)